以编程方式使用文档

在本教程中,我们将构建一个客户服务机器人,帮助用户在数字音乐商店中导航。然后,我们将介绍对聊天机器人运行的三种最有效的评估类型:

  • * **最终响应**:评估代理的最终响应。
  • * **轨迹**:评估代理是否采用了预期的路径(例如工具调用)来得出最终答案。
  • * **单步**:独立评估任何代理步骤(例如,它是否为给定步骤选择了合适的第一步工具)。

我们将使用 LangGraph来构建我们的代理,但此处展示的技术和 LangSmith 功能与框架无关。

设置

配置环境

让我们安装所需的依赖项:

pip install -U langgraph "langchain[openai]"
uv add langgraph "langchain[openai]"

让我们为 OpenAI 和 LangSmith:

def _set_env(var: str) -> None:
    if not os.environ.get(var):
        os.environ[var] = getpass.getpass(f"Set {var}: ")

os.environ["LANGSMITH_TRACING"] = "true"
_set_env("LANGSMITH_API_KEY")
_set_env("OPENAI_API_KEY")

下载数据库

我们将为此教程创建一个 SQLite 数据库。SQLite 是一个轻量级数据库,易于设置和使用。我们将加载 chinook 数据库,这是一个代表数字媒体商店的示例数据库。如需更多信息,请参阅 Chinook 示例数据库.

为方便起见,我们将数据库托管在一个公开的 GCS 存储桶中:

url = "https://storage.googleapis.com/benchmarks-artifacts/chinook/Chinook.db"
response = requests.get(url)

if response.status_code == 200:
    # Open a local file in binary write mode
    with open("chinook.db", "wb") as file:
        # Write the content of the response (the file) to the local file
        file.write(response.content)
    print("File downloaded and saved as Chinook.db")
else:
    print(f"Failed to download the file. Status code: {response.status_code}")

以下是数据库中数据的示例:

# ... database connection and query code
[(1, 'AC/DC'), (2, 'Accept'), (3, 'Aerosmith'), (4, 'Alanis Morissette'), (5, 'Alice In Chains'), (6, 'Antônio Carlos Jobim'), (7, 'Apocalyptica'), (8, 'Audioslave'), (9, 'BackBeat'), (10, 'Billy Cobham')]

以下是数据库架构(图片来自 https://github.com/lerocha/chinook-database):

!Chinook DB

定义客户支持代理

我们将创建一个 LangGraph 代理,它对我们数据库的访问权限有限。为演示目的,我们的代理将支持两种基本类型的请求:

  • * 查询:客户可以根据其他识别信息查找歌曲名称、艺术家姓名和专辑。例如:「您有哪些 Jimi Hendrix 的歌曲?」
  • * 退款:客户可以申请退还过去的购买。例如:「我叫 Claude Shannon,我想退还上周购买的一件商品,您能帮我吗?」

为简化此演示,我们将通过删除相应的数据库记录来实现退款。我们将跳过用户认证和其他生产安全措施的实现。

代理的逻辑将被构建为两个独立的子图(一个用于查询,一个用于退款),以及一个将请求路由到相应子图的父图。

退款代理

让我们构建退款处理代理。这个代理需要:

  1. 在数据库中查找客户的购买记录
  2. 删除相关的 Invoice 和 InvoiceLine 记录以处理退款

我们将创建两个 SQL 辅助函数:

  1. 一个通过删除记录来执行退款的函数
  2. 一个用于查找客户购买历史的函数

为了更容易进行测试,我们将为这些函数添加一个「模拟」模式。当启用模拟模式时,这些函数将模拟数据库操作,而不实际修改任何数据。

def _refund(invoice_id: int | None, invoice_line_ids: list[int] | None, mock: bool = False) -> float:
    ...

def _lookup( ...

现在让我们定义我们的图。我们将使用一个包含三条主要路径的简单架构:

  1. 从对话中提取客户和购买信息
  1. 将请求路由到三条路径之一:
  • * 退款路径:如果我们有足够的购买详细信息(发票ID或发票行项目ID)来处理退款
  • * 查询路径:如果我们有足够的客户信息(姓名和电话)来搜索他们的购买历史
  • * 响应路径:如果我们需要更多信息,向用户回复请求所需的具体详细信息

图的state将追踪:

  • * 对话历史记录(用户与代理之间的消息)
  • * 从对话中提取的所有客户和购买信息
  • * 要发送给用户的下一条消息(跟进文本)
from typing import Literal


from langchain.chat_models import init_chat_model
from langchain_core.runnables import RunnableConfig
from langgraph.graph import END, StateGraph
from langgraph.graph.message import AnyMessage, add_messages
from langgraph.types import Command, interrupt
from tabulate import tabulate
from typing_extensions import Annotated, TypedDict

# Graph state.
class State(TypedDict):
    """Agent state."""
    messages: Annotated[list[AnyMessage], add_messages]
    followup: str | None

    invoice_id: int | None
    invoice_line_ids: list[int] | None
    customer_first_name: str | None
    customer_last_name: str | None
    customer_phone: str | None
    track_name: str | None
    album_title: str | None
    artist_name: str | None
    purchase_date_iso_8601: str | None

# Instructions for extracting the user/purchase info from the conversation.
gather_info_instructions = """You are managing an online music store that sells song tracks. \
Customers can buy multiple tracks at a time and these purchases are recorded in a database as \
an Invoice per purchase and an associated set of Invoice Lines for each purchased track.

Your task is to help customers who would like a refund for one or more of the tracks they've \
purchased. In order for you to be able refund them, the customer must specify the Invoice ID \
to get a refund on all the tracks they bought in a single transaction, or one or more Invoice \
Line IDs if they would like refunds on individual tracks.

Often a user will not know the specific Invoice ID(s) or Invoice Line ID(s) for which they \
would like a refund. In this case you can help them look up their invoices by asking them to \
specify:
- Required: Their first name, last name, and phone number.
- Optionally: The track name, artist name, album name, or purchase date.

If the customer has not specified the required information (either Invoice/Invoice Line IDs \
or first name, last name, phone) then please ask them to specify it."""

# Extraction schema, mirrors the graph state.
class PurchaseInformation(TypedDict):
    """All of the known information about the invoice / invoice lines the customer would like refunded. Do not make up values, leave fields as null if you don't know their value."""

    invoice_id: int | None
    invoice_line_ids: list[int] | None
    customer_first_name: str | None
    customer_last_name: str | None
    customer_phone: str | None
    track_name: str | None
    album_title: str | None
    artist_name: str | None
    purchase_date_iso_8601: str | None
    followup: Annotated[
        str | None,
        ...,
        "If the user hasn't enough identifying information, please tell them what the required information is and ask them to specify it.",
    ]

# Model for performing extraction.
info_llm = init_chat_model("gpt-5.4-mini").with_structured_output(
    PurchaseInformation, method="json_schema", include_raw=True
)

# Graph node for extracting user info and routing to lookup/refund/END.
async def gather_info(state: State) -> Command[Literal["lookup", "refund", END]]:
    info = await info_llm.ainvoke(
        [
            {"role": "system", "content": gather_info_instructions},
            *state["messages"],
        ]
    )
    parsed = info["parsed"]
    if any(parsed[k] for k in ("invoice_id", "invoice_line_ids")):
        goto = "refund"
    elif all(
        parsed[k]
        for k in ("customer_first_name", "customer_last_name", "customer_phone")
    ):
        goto = "lookup"
    else:
        goto = END
    update = {"messages": [info["raw"]], **parsed}
    return Command(update=update, goto=goto)

# Graph node for executing the refund.
# Note that here we inspect the runtime config for an "env" variable.
# If "env" is set to "test", then we don't actually delete any rows from our database.
# This will become important when we're running our evaluations.
def refund(state: State, config: RunnableConfig) -> dict:
    # Whether to mock the deletion. True if the configurable var 'env' is set to 'test'.
    mock = config.get("configurable", {}).get("env", "prod") == "test"
    refunded = _refund(
        invoice_id=state["invoice_id"], invoice_line_ids=state["invoice_line_ids"], mock=mock
    )
    response = f"You have been refunded a total of: ${refunded:.2f}. Is there anything else I can help with?"
    return {
        "messages": [{"role": "assistant", "content": response}],
        "followup": response,
    }

# Graph node for looking up the users purchases
def lookup(state: State) -> dict:
    args = (
        state[k]
        for k in (
            "customer_first_name",
            "customer_last_name",
            "customer_phone",
            "track_name",
            "album_title",
            "artist_name",
            "purchase_date_iso_8601",
        )
    )
    results = _lookup(*args)
    if not results:
        response = "We did not find any purchases associated with the information you've provided. Are you sure you've entered all of your information correctly?"
        followup = response
    else:
        response = f"Which of the following purchases would you like to be refunded for?\n\n
json{json.dumps(results, indent=2)}\n
        followup = f"Which of the following purchases would you like to be refunded for?\n\n{tabulate(results, headers='keys')}"
    return {
        "messages": [{"role": "assistant", "content": response}],
        "followup": followup,
        "invoice_line_ids": [res["invoice_line_id"] for res in results],
    }

# Building our graph
graph_builder = StateGraph(State)

graph_builder.add_node(gather_info)
graph_builder.add_node(refund)
graph_builder.add_node(lookup)

graph_builder.set_entry_point("gather_info")
graph_builder.add_edge("lookup", END)
graph_builder.add_edge("refund", END)

refund_graph = graph_builder.compile()

我们可以可视化我们的退款图:

# Assumes you're in an interactive Python environmentfrom IPython.display import Image, display ...

!退款图

查询代理

对于查询(即问答)代理,我们将使用一个简单的ReACT架构,并赋予代理工具来根据各种过滤器查找曲目名称、艺术家名称和专辑名称。例如,您可以按特定艺术家查找专辑、按特定名称查找发行过歌曲的艺术家等。

from langchain.embeddings import init_embeddings
from langchain.tools import tool
from langchain_core.vectorstores import InMemoryVectorStore
from langchain.agents import create_agent


# Our SQL queries will only work if we filter on the exact string values that are in the DB.
# To ensure this, we'll create vectorstore indexes for all of the artists, tracks and albums
# ahead of time and use those to disambiguate the user input. E.g. if a user searches for
# songs by "prince" and our DB records the artist as "Prince", ideally when we query our
# artist vectorstore for "prince" we'll get back the value "Prince", which we can then
# use in our SQL queries.
def index_fields() -> tuple[InMemoryVectorStore, InMemoryVectorStore, InMemoryVectorStore]: ...

track_store, artist_store, album_store = index_fields()

# Agent tools
@tool
def lookup_track( ...

@tool
def lookup_album( ...

@tool
def lookup_artist( ...

# Agent model
qa_llm = init_chat_model("claude-sonnet-4-6")
# The prebuilt ReACT agent only expects State to have a 'messages' key, so the
# state we defined for the refund agent can also be passed to our lookup agent.
qa_graph = create_agent(qa_llm, tools=[lookup_track, lookup_artist, lookup_album])
display(Image(qa_graph.get_graph(xray=True).draw_mermaid_png()))

!问答图

父代理

现在让我们定义一个父代理,它结合了我们的两个任务特定代理。父代理的唯一工作是通过对用户当前意图进行分类来路由到其中一个子代理,并将输出编译成跟进消息。

# Schema for routing user intent.
# We'll use structured output to enforce that the model returns only
# the desired output.
class UserIntent(TypedDict):
    """The user's current intent in the conversation"""

    intent: Literal["refund", "question_answering"]

# Routing model with structured output
router_llm = init_chat_model("gpt-5.4-mini").with_structured_output(
    UserIntent, method="json_schema", strict=True
)

# Instructions for routing.
route_instructions = """You are managing an online music store that sells song tracks. \
You can help customers in two types of ways: (1) answering general questions about \
tracks sold at your store, (2) helping them get a refund on a purhcase they made at your store.

Based on the following conversation, determine if the user is currently seeking general \
information about song tracks or if they are trying to refund a specific purchase.

Return 'refund' if they are trying to get a refund and 'question_answering' if they are \
asking a general music question. Do NOT return anything else. Do NOT try to respond to \
the user.
"""

# Node for routing.
async def intent_classifier(
    state: State,
) -> Command[Literal["refund_agent", "question_answering_agent"]]:
    response = router_llm.invoke(
        [{"role": "system", "content": route_instructions}, *state["messages"]]
    )
    return Command(goto=response["intent"] + "_agent")

# Node for making sure the 'followup' key is set before our agent run completes.
def compile_followup(state: State) -> dict:
    """Set the followup to be the last message if it hasn't explicitly been set."""
    if not state.get("followup"):
        return {"followup": state["messages"][-1].content}
    return {}

# Agent definition
graph_builder = StateGraph(State)
graph_builder.add_node(intent_classifier)
# Since all of our subagents have compatible state,
# we can add them as nodes directly.
graph_builder.add_node("refund_agent", refund_graph)
graph_builder.add_node("question_answering_agent", qa_graph)
graph_builder.add_node(compile_followup)

graph_builder.set_entry_point("intent_classifier")
graph_builder.add_edge("refund_agent", "compile_followup")
graph_builder.add_edge("question_answering_agent", "compile_followup")
graph_builder.add_edge("compile_followup", END)

graph = graph_builder.compile()

我们可以可视化包含所有子图的编译后的父图:

display(Image(graph.get_graph().draw_mermaid_png()))

!

试试看

让我们试试我们的自定义支持代理!

state = await graph.ainvoke(
    {"messages": [{"role": "user", "content": "what james brown songs do you have"}]}
)
print(state["followup"])
I found 20 James Brown songs in the database, all from the album "Sex Machine". Here they are: ...
state = await graph.ainvoke({"messages": [
    {
        "role": "user",
        "content": "my name is Aaron Mitchell and my number is +1 (204) 452-6452. I bought some songs by Led Zeppelin that i'd like refunded",
    }
]})
print(state["followup"])
Which of the following purchases would you like to be refunded for? ...

评估

现在我们有了可测试的代理版本,让我们运行一些评估。代理评估可以关注至少三个方面:

  • * 最终响应:输入是一个提示和一个可选的工具列表。输出是最终的代理响应。
  • * 轨迹:与之前一样,输入是一个提示和一个可选的工具列表。输出是工具调用列表
  • * 单步:与之前一样,输入是一个提示和一个可选的工具列表。输出是工具调用。

让我们运行每种类型的评估:

最终响应评估器

首先,让我们创建一个 数据集 来评估代理的端到端性能。为简单起见,我们将使用相同的数据集进行最终响应和轨迹评估,因此我们将为每个示例问题添加真实响应和轨迹。我们将在下一节介绍轨迹。

from langsmith import Client

client = Client()

# Create a dataset
examples = [
    {
        "inputs": {
            "question": "How many songs do you have by James Brown",
        },
        "outputs": {
            "response": "We have 20 songs by James Brown",
            "trajectory": ["question_answering_agent", "lookup_track"]
        }
    },
    {
        "inputs": {
            "question": "My name is Aaron Mitchell and I'd like a refund.",
        },
        "outputs": {
            "response": "I need some more information to help you with the refund. Please specify your phone number, the invoice ID, or the line item IDs for the purchase you'd like refunded.",
            "trajectory": ["refund_agent"],
        }
    },
    {
        "inputs": {
            "question": "My name is Aaron Mitchell and I'd like a refund on my Led Zeppelin purchases. My number is +1 (204) 452-6452",
        },
        "outputs": {
            "response": 'Which of the following purchases would you like to be refunded for?\n\n  invoice_line_id  track_name                        artist_name    purchase_date          quantity_purchased    price_per_unit\n-----------------  --------------------------------  -------------  -------------------  --------------------  ----------------\n              267  How Many More Times               Led Zeppelin   2009-08-06 00:00:00                     1              0.99\n              268  What Is And What Should Never Be  Led Zeppelin   2009-08-06 00:00:00                     1              0.99',
            "trajectory": ["refund_agent", "lookup"],
        },
    },
    {
        "inputs": {
            "question": "Who recorded Wish You Were Here again? What other albums of there's do you have?",
        },
        "outputs": {
            "response": "Wish You Were Here is an album by Pink Floyd",
            "trajectory": ["question_answering_agent", "lookup_album"],
        },
    },
    {
        "inputs": {
            "question": "I want a full refund for invoice 237",
        },
        "outputs": {
            "response": "You have been refunded $0.99.",
            "trajectory": ["refund_agent", "refund"],
        }
    },
]

dataset_name = "Chinook Customer Service Bot: E2E"

if not client.has_dataset(dataset_name=dataset_name):
    dataset = client.create_dataset(dataset_name=dataset_name)
    client.create_examples(
        dataset_id=dataset.id,
        examples=examples
    )

我们将创建一个自定义 LLM-as-judge 评估器,它使用另一个模型将我们代理在每个示例上的输出与参考响应进行比较,并判断它们是否等价:

# LLM-as-judge instructions
grader_instructions = """You are a teacher grading a quiz.

You will be given a QUESTION, the GROUND TRUTH (correct) RESPONSE, and the STUDENT RESPONSE.

Here is the grade criteria to follow:
(1) Grade the student responses based ONLY on their factual accuracy relative to the ground truth answer.
(2) Ensure that the student response does not contain any conflicting statements.
(3) It is OK if the student response contains more information than the ground truth response, as long as it is factually accurate relative to the  ground truth response.

Correctness:
True means that the student's response meets all of the criteria.
False means that the student's response does not meet all of the criteria.

Explain your reasoning in a step-by-step manner to ensure your reasoning and conclusion are correct."""

# LLM-as-judge output schema
class Grade(TypedDict):
    """Compare the expected and actual answers and grade the actual answer."""
    reasoning: Annotated[str, ..., "Explain your reasoning for whether the actual response is correct or not."]
    is_correct: Annotated[bool, ..., "True if the student response is mostly or exactly correct, otherwise False."]

# Judge LLM
grader_llm = init_chat_model("gpt-5.4-mini", temperature=0).with_structured_output(Grade, method="json_schema", strict=True)

# Evaluator function
async def final_answer_correct(inputs: dict, outputs: dict, reference_outputs: dict) -> bool:
    """Evaluate if the final response is equivalent to reference response."""

    # Note that we assume the outputs has a 'response' dictionary. We'll need to make sure
    # that the target function we define includes this key.
    user = f"""QUESTION: {inputs['question']}
    GROUND TRUTH RESPONSE: {reference_outputs['response']}
    STUDENT RESPONSE: {outputs['response']}"""

    grade = await grader_llm.ainvoke([{"role": "system", "content": grader_instructions}, {"role": "user", "content": user}])
    return grade["is_correct"]

现在我们可以运行评估了。我们的评估器假设我们的目标函数返回一个'response'键,所以我们定义一个这样的目标函数。

还要记住,在我们的退款图中,我们使退款节点可配置,这样如果我们指定了 config={"env": "test"},我们将在不实际更新数据库的情况下模拟退款。我们将在目标函数中使用这个可配置变量 run_graph 调用图时的方法:

# Target function
async def run_graph(inputs: dict) -> dict:
    """Run graph and track the trajectory it takes along with the final response."""
    result = await graph.ainvoke({"messages": [
        { "role": "user", "content": inputs['question']},
    ]}, config={"env": "test"})
    return {"response": result["followup"]}

# Evaluation job and results
experiment_results = await client.aevaluate(
    run_graph,
    data=dataset_name,
    evaluators=[final_answer_correct],
    experiment_prefix="sql-agent-gpt4o-e2e",
    num_repetitions=1,
    max_concurrency=4,
)
experiment_results.to_pandas()

您可以在此处查看这些结果的样子: LangSmith 链接.

轨迹评估器

As agents become more complex, they have more potential points of failure. Rather than using simple pass/fail evaluations, it's often better to use evaluations that can give partial credit when an agent takes some correct steps, even if it doesn't reach the right final answer.

这就是轨迹评估的用武之地。轨迹评估:

  1. 将智能体实际执行的步骤序列与预期序列进行比较
  2. 根据正确完成的预期步骤数量计算得分

在这个示例中,我们的端到端数据集包含一个预期智能体执行的步骤有序列表。让我们创建一个评估器,检查智能体的实际轨迹与这些预期步骤,并计算完成百分比:

def trajectory_subsequence(outputs: dict, reference_outputs: dict) -> float:
    """Check how many of the desired steps the agent took."""
    if len(reference_outputs['trajectory']) > len(outputs['trajectory']):
        return False

    i = j = 0
    while i < len(reference_outputs['trajectory']) and j < len(outputs['trajectory']):
        if reference_outputs['trajectory'][i] == outputs['trajectory'][j]:
            i += 1
        j += 1

    return i / len(reference_outputs['trajectory'])

现在我们可以运行评估了。我们的评估器假设目标函数返回一个 'trajectory' 键,因此让我们定义一个这样做的目标函数。我们需要使用 LangGraph 的流式处理能力 来记录轨迹。

请注意,我们正在重用与最终响应评估相同的数据集,因此我们可以一起运行两个评估器,并定义一个同时返回 "response" 和 "trajectory" 的目标函数。在实践中,为每种类型的评估使用单独的数据集通常很有用,这就是为什么我们在此分别展示它们:

async def run_graph(inputs: dict) -> dict:
    """Run graph and track the trajectory it takes along with the final response."""
    trajectory = []
    # Set subgraph=True to stream events from subgraphs of the main graph: https://langchain-ai.github.io/langgraph/how-tos/streaming-subgraphs/
    # Set stream_mode="debug" to stream all possible events: https://langchain-ai.github.io/langgra/langsmith/observability-concepts/streaming
    async for namespace, chunk in graph.astream({"messages": [
            {
                "role": "user",
                "content": inputs['question'],
            }
        ]}, subgraphs=True, stream_mode="debug"):
        # Event type for entering a node
        if chunk['type'] == 'task':
            # Record the node name
            trajectory.append(chunk['payload']['name'])
            # Given how we defined our dataset, we also need to track when specific tools are
            # called by our question answering ReACT agent. These tool calls can be found
            # when the ToolsNode (named "tools") is invoked by looking at the AIMessage.tool_calls
            # of the latest input message.
            if chunk['payload']['name'] == 'tools' and chunk['type'] == 'task':
                for tc in chunk['payload']['input']['messages'][-1].tool_calls:
                    trajectory.append(tc['name'])
    return {"trajectory": trajectory}

experiment_results = await client.aevaluate(
    run_graph,
    data=dataset_name,
    evaluators=[trajectory_subsequence],
    experiment_prefix="sql-agent-gpt4o-trajectory",
    num_repetitions=1,
    max_concurrency=4,
)
experiment_results.to_pandas()

您可以在此处查看这些结果的样子: LangSmith 链接.

单步评估器

虽然端到端测试可以为您提供关于智能体性能的最强信号,但为了调试和迭代您的智能体,精确定位困难的特定步骤并直接评估它们可能会很有帮助。

在我们的案例中,智能体的一个关键部分是它能正确地将用户意图路由到 "退款" 路径或 "问答" 路径。让我们创建一个数据集并运行一些评估,以直接对这个组件进行压力测试。

# Create dataset
examples = [
    {
        "inputs": {"messages": [{"role": "user", "content": "i bought some tracks recently and i dont like them"}]},
        "outputs": {"route": "refund_agent"},
    },
    {
        "inputs": {"messages": [{"role": "user", "content": "I was thinking of purchasing some Rolling Stones tunes, any recommendations?"}]},
        "outputs": {"route": "question_answering_agent"},
    },
    {
        "inputs": {"messages": [{"role": "user", "content": "i want a refund on purchase 237"}, {"role": "assistant", "content": "I've refunded you a total of $1.98. How else can I help you today?"}, {"role": "user", "content": "did prince release any albums in 2000?"}]},
        "outputs": {"route": "question_answering_agent"},
    },
    {
        "inputs": {"messages": [{"role": "user", "content": "i purchased a cover of Yesterday recently but can't remember who it was by, which versions of it do you have?"}]},
        "outputs": {"route": "question_answering_agent"},
    },
]

dataset_name = "Chinook Customer Service Bot: Intent Classifier"
if not client.has_dataset(dataset_name=dataset_name):
    dataset = client.create_dataset(dataset_name=dataset_name)
    client.create_examples(
        dataset_id=dataset.id,
        examples=examples
    )

# Evaluator
def correct(outputs: dict, reference_outputs: dict) -> bool:
    """Check if the agent chose the correct route."""
    return outputs["route"] == reference_outputs["route"]

# Target function for running the relevant step
async def run_intent_classifier(inputs: dict) -> dict:
    # Note that we can access and run the intent_classifier node of our graph directly.
    command = await graph.nodes['intent_classifier'].ainvoke(inputs)
    return {"route": command.goto}

# Run evaluation
experiment_results = await client.aevaluate(
    run_intent_classifier,
    data=dataset_name,
    evaluators=[correct],
    experiment_prefix="sql-agent-gpt4o-intent-classifier",
    max_concurrency=4,
)

您可以在此处查看这些结果的样子: LangSmith 链接.

参考代码

以下是包含所有上述代码的整合脚本:

Reference code

from typing import Literal

from langchain.chat_models import init_chat_model
from langchain.embeddings import init_embeddings
from langchain_core.runnables import RunnableConfig
from langchain.tools import tool
from langchain_core.vectorstores import InMemoryVectorStore
from langgraph.graph import END, StateGraph
from langgraph.graph.message import AnyMessage, add_messages
from langchain.agents import create_agent
from langgraph.types import Command, interrupt
from langsmith import Client

from tabulate import tabulate
from typing_extensions import Annotated, TypedDict


url = "https://storage.googleapis.com/benchmarks-artifacts/chinook/Chinook.db"

response = requests.get(url)

if response.status_code == 200:
    # Open a local file in binary write mode
    with open("chinook.db", "wb") as file:
        # Write the content of the response (the file) to the local file
        file.write(response.content)
    print("File downloaded and saved as Chinook.db")
else:
    print(f"Failed to download the file. Status code: {response.status_code}")


def _refund(
    invoice_id: int | None, invoice_line_ids: list[int] | None, mock: bool = False
) -> float:
    """Given an Invoice ID and/or Invoice Line IDs, delete the relevant Invoice/InvoiceLine records in the Chinook DB.

    Args:
        invoice_id: The Invoice to delete.
        invoice_line_ids: The Invoice Lines to delete.
        mock: If True, do not actually delete the specified Invoice/Invoice Lines. Used for testing purposes.

    Returns:
        float: The total dollar amount that was deleted (or mock deleted).
    """

    if invoice_id is None and invoice_line_ids is None:
        return 0.0

    # Connect to the Chinook database
    conn = sqlite3.connect("chinook.db")
    cursor = conn.cursor()

    total_refund = 0.0

    try:
        # If invoice_id is provided, delete entire invoice and its lines
        if invoice_id is not None:
            # First get the total amount for the invoice
            cursor.execute(
                """
                SELECT Total
                FROM Invoice
                WHERE InvoiceId = ?
            """,
                (invoice_id,),
            )

            result = cursor.fetchone()
            if result:
                total_refund += result[0]

            # Delete invoice lines first (due to foreign key constraints)
            if not mock:
                cursor.execute(
                    """
                    DELETE FROM InvoiceLine
                    WHERE InvoiceId = ?
                """,
                    (invoice_id,),
                )

                # Then delete the invoice
                cursor.execute(
                    """
                    DELETE FROM Invoice
                    WHERE InvoiceId = ?
                """,
                    (invoice_id,),
                )

        # If specific invoice lines are provided
        if invoice_line_ids is not None:
            # Get the total amount for the specified invoice lines
            placeholders = ",".join(["?" for _ in invoice_line_ids])
            cursor.execute(
                f"""
                SELECT SUM(UnitPrice * Quantity)
                FROM InvoiceLine
                WHERE InvoiceLineId IN ({placeholders})
            """,
                invoice_line_ids,
            )

            result = cursor.fetchone()
            if result and result[0]:
                total_refund += result[0]

            if not mock:
                # Delete the specified invoice lines
                cursor.execute(
                    f"""
                    DELETE FROM InvoiceLine
                    WHERE InvoiceLineId IN ({placeholders})
                """,
                    invoice_line_ids,
                )

        # Commit the changes
        conn.commit()

    except sqlite3.Error as e:
        # Roll back in case of error
        conn.rollback()
        raise e

    finally:
        # Close the connection
        conn.close()

    return float(total_refund)


def _lookup(
    customer_first_name: str,
    customer_last_name: str,
    customer_phone: str,
    track_name: str | None,
    album_title: str | None,
    artist_name: str | None,
    purchase_date_iso_8601: str | None,
) -> list[dict]:
    """Find all of the Invoice Line IDs in the Chinook DB for the given filters.

    Returns:
        a list of dictionaries that contain keys: {
            'invoice_line_id',
            'track_name',
            'artist_name',
            'purchase_date',
            'quantity_purchased',
            'price_per_unit'
        }
    """

    # Connect to the database
    conn = sqlite3.connect("chinook.db")
    cursor = conn.cursor()

    # Base query joining all necessary tables
    query = """
    SELECT
        il.InvoiceLineId,
        t.Name as track_name,
        art.Name as artist_name,
        i.InvoiceDate as purchase_date,
        il.Quantity as quantity_purchased,
        il.UnitPrice as price_per_unit
    FROM InvoiceLine il
    JOIN Invoice i ON il.InvoiceId = i.InvoiceId
    JOIN Customer c ON i.CustomerId = c.CustomerId
    JOIN Track t ON il.TrackId = t.TrackId
    JOIN Album alb ON t.AlbumId = alb.AlbumId
    JOIN Artist art ON alb.ArtistId = art.ArtistId
    WHERE c.FirstName = ?
    AND c.LastName = ?
    AND c.Phone = ?
    """

    # Parameters for the query
    params = [customer_first_name, customer_last_name, customer_phone]

    # Add optional filters
    if track_name:
        query += " AND t.Name = ?"
        params.append(track_name)

    if album_title:
        query += " AND alb.Title = ?"
        params.append(album_title)

    if artist_name:
        query += " AND art.Name = ?"
        params.append(artist_name)

    if purchase_date_iso_8601:
        query += " AND date(i.InvoiceDate) = date(?)"
        params.append(purchase_date_iso_8601)

    # Execute query
    cursor.execute(query, params)

    # Fetch results
    results = cursor.fetchall()

    # Convert results to list of dictionaries
    output = []
    for row in results:
        output.append(
            {
                "invoice_line_id": row[0],
                "track_name": row[1],
                "artist_name": row[2],
                "purchase_date": row[3],
                "quantity_purchased": row[4],
                "price_per_unit": row[5],
            }
        )

    # Close connection
    conn.close()

    return output


# Graph state.
class State(TypedDict):
    """Agent state."""

    messages: Annotated[list[AnyMessage], add_messages]
    followup: str | None

    invoice_id: int | None
    invoice_line_ids: list[int] | None
    customer_first_name: str | None
    customer_last_name: str | None
    customer_phone: str | None
    track_name: str | None
    album_title: str | None
    artist_name: str | None
    purchase_date_iso_8601: str | None


# Instructions for extracting the user/purchase info from the conversation.
gather_info_instructions = """You are managing an online music store that sells song tracks. \
Customers can buy multiple tracks at a time and these purchases are recorded in a database as \
an Invoice per purchase and an associated set of Invoice Lines for each purchased track.

Your task is to help customers who would like a refund for one or more of the tracks they've \
purchased. In order for you to be able refund them, the customer must specify the Invoice ID \
to get a refund on all the tracks they bought in a single transaction, or one or more Invoice \
Line IDs if they would like refunds on individual tracks.

Often a user will not know the specific Invoice ID(s) or Invoice Line ID(s) for which they \
would like a refund. In this case you can help them look up their invoices by asking them to \
specify:
- Required: Their first name, last name, and phone number.
- Optionally: The track name, artist name, album name, or purchase date.

If the customer has not specified the required information (either Invoice/Invoice Line IDs \
or first name, last name, phone) then please ask them to specify it."""


# Extraction schema, mirrors the graph state.
class PurchaseInformation(TypedDict):
    """All of the known information about the invoice / invoice lines the customer would like refunded. Do not make up values, leave fields as null if you don't know their value."""

    invoice_id: int | None
    invoice_line_ids: list[int] | None
    customer_first_name: str | None
    customer_last_name: str | None
    customer_phone: str | None
    track_name: str | None
    album_title: str | None
    artist_name: str | None
    purchase_date_iso_8601: str | None
    followup: Annotated[
        str | None,
        ...,
        "If the user hasn't enough identifying information, please tell them what the required information is and ask them to specify it.",
    ]


# Model for performing extraction.
info_llm = init_chat_model("gpt-5.4-mini").with_structured_output(
    PurchaseInformation, method="json_schema", include_raw=True
)


# Graph node for extracting user info and routing to lookup/refund/END.
async def gather_info(state: State) -> Command[Literal["lookup", "refund", END]]:
    info = await info_llm.ainvoke(
        [
            {"role": "system", "content": gather_info_instructions},
            *state["messages"],
        ]
    )
    parsed = info["parsed"]
    if any(parsed[k] for k in ("invoice_id", "invoice_line_ids")):
        goto = "refund"
    elif all(
        parsed[k]
        for k in ("customer_first_name", "customer_last_name", "customer_phone")
    ):
        goto = "lookup"
    else:
        goto = END
    update = {"messages": [info["raw"]], **parsed}
    return Command(update=update, goto=goto)


# Graph node for executing the refund.
# Note that here we inspect the runtime config for an "env" variable.
# If "env" is set to "test", then we don't actually delete any rows from our database.
# This will become important when we're running our evaluations.
def refund(state: State, config: RunnableConfig) -> dict:
    # Whether to mock the deletion. True if the configurable var 'env' is set to 'test'.
    mock = config.get("configurable", {}).get("env", "prod") == "test"
    refunded = _refund(
        invoice_id=state["invoice_id"],
        invoice_line_ids=state["invoice_line_ids"],
        mock=mock,
    )
    response = f"You have been refunded a total of: ${refunded:.2f}. Is there anything else I can help with?"
    return {
        "messages": [{"role": "assistant", "content": response}],
        "followup": response,
    }


# Graph node for looking up the users purchases
def lookup(state: State) -> dict:
    args = (
        state[k]
        for k in (
            "customer_first_name",
            "customer_last_name",
            "customer_phone",
            "track_name",
            "album_title",
            "artist_name",
            "purchase_date_iso_8601",
        )
    )
    results = _lookup(*args)
    if not results:
        response = "We did not find any purchases associated with the information you've provided. Are you sure you've entered all of your information correctly?"
        followup = response
    else:
        response = f"Which of the following purchases would you like to be refunded for?\n\n
json{json.dumps(results, indent=2)}\n
        followup = f"Which of the following purchases would you like to be refunded for?\n\n{tabulate(results, headers='keys')}"
    return {
        "messages": [{"role": "assistant", "content": response}],
        "followup": followup,
        "invoice_line_ids": [res["invoice_line_id"] for res in results],
    }


# Building our graph
graph_builder = StateGraph(State)

graph_builder.add_node(gather_info)
graph_builder.add_node(refund)
graph_builder.add_node(lookup)

graph_builder.set_entry_point("gather_info")
graph_builder.add_edge("lookup", END)
graph_builder.add_edge("refund", END)

refund_graph = graph_builder.compile()


# Our SQL queries will only work if we filter on the exact string values that are in the DB.
# To ensure this, we'll create vectorstore indexes for all of the artists, tracks and albums
# ahead of time and use those to disambiguate the user input. E.g. if a user searches for
# songs by "prince" and our DB records the artist as "Prince", ideally when we query our
# artist vectorstore for "prince" we'll get back the value "Prince", which we can then
# use in our SQL queries.
def index_fields() -> (
    tuple[InMemoryVectorStore, InMemoryVectorStore, InMemoryVectorStore]
):
    """Create an index for all artists, an index for all albums, and an index for all songs."""
    try:
        # Connect to the chinook database
        conn = sqlite3.connect("chinook.db")
        cursor = conn.cursor()

        # Fetch all results
        tracks = cursor.execute("SELECT Name FROM Track").fetchall()
        artists = cursor.execute("SELECT Name FROM Artist").fetchall()
        albums = cursor.execute("SELECT Title FROM Album").fetchall()
    finally:
        # Close the connection
        if conn:
            conn.close()

    embeddings = init_embeddings("openai:text-embedding-3-small")

    track_store = InMemoryVectorStore(embeddings)
    artist_store = InMemoryVectorStore(embeddings)
    album_store = InMemoryVectorStore(embeddings)

    track_store.add_texts([t[0] for t in tracks])
    artist_store.add_texts([a[0] for a in artists])
    album_store.add_texts([a[0] for a in albums])
    return track_store, artist_store, album_store


track_store, artist_store, album_store = index_fields()


# Agent tools
@tool
def lookup_track(
    track_name: str | None = None,
    album_title: str | None = None,
    artist_name: str | None = None,
) -> list[dict]:
    """Lookup a track in Chinook DB based on identifying information about.

    Returns:
        a list of dictionaries per matching track that contain keys {'track_name', 'artist_name', 'album_name'}
    """
    conn = sqlite3.connect("chinook.db")
    cursor = conn.cursor()

    query = """
    SELECT DISTINCT t.Name as track_name, ar.Name as artist_name, al.Title as album_name
    FROM Track t
    JOIN Album al ON t.AlbumId = al.AlbumId
    JOIN Artist ar ON al.ArtistId = ar.ArtistId
    WHERE 1=1
    """
    params = []

    if track_name:
        track_name = track_store.similarity_search(track_name, k=1)[0].page_content
        query += " AND t.Name LIKE ?"
        params.append(f"%{track_name}%")
    if album_title:
        album_title = album_store.similarity_search(album_title, k=1)[0].page_content
        query += " AND al.Title LIKE ?"
        params.append(f"%{album_title}%")
    if artist_name:
        artist_name = artist_store.similarity_search(artist_name, k=1)[0].page_content
        query += " AND ar.Name LIKE ?"
        params.append(f"%{artist_name}%")

    cursor.execute(query, params)
    results = cursor.fetchall()

    tracks = [
        {"track_name": row[0], "artist_name": row[1], "album_name": row[2]}
        for row in results
    ]

    conn.close()
    return tracks


@tool
def lookup_album(
    track_name: str | None = None,
    album_title: str | None = None,
    artist_name: str | None = None,
) -> list[dict]:
    """Lookup an album in Chinook DB based on identifying information about.

    Returns:
        a list of dictionaries per matching album that contain keys {'album_name', 'artist_name'}
    """
    conn = sqlite3.connect("chinook.db")
    cursor = conn.cursor()

    query = """
    SELECT DISTINCT al.Title as album_name, ar.Name as artist_name
    FROM Album al
    JOIN Artist ar ON al.ArtistId = ar.ArtistId
    LEFT JOIN Track t ON t.AlbumId = al.AlbumId
    WHERE 1=1
    """
    params = []

    if track_name:
        query += " AND t.Name LIKE ?"
        params.append(f"%{track_name}%")
    if album_title:
        query += " AND al.Title LIKE ?"
        params.append(f"%{album_title}%")
    if artist_name:
        query += " AND ar.Name LIKE ?"
        params.append(f"%{artist_name}%")

    cursor.execute(query, params)
    results = cursor.fetchall()

    albums = [{"album_name": row[0], "artist_name": row[1]} for row in results]

    conn.close()
    return albums


@tool
def lookup_artist(
    track_name: str | None = None,
    album_title: str | None = None,
    artist_name: str | None = None,
) -> list[str]:
    """Lookup an album in Chinook DB based on identifying information about.

    Returns:
        a list of matching artist names
    """
    conn = sqlite3.connect("chinook.db")
    cursor = conn.cursor()

    query = """
    SELECT DISTINCT ar.Name as artist_name
    FROM Artist ar
    LEFT JOIN Album al ON al.ArtistId = ar.ArtistId
    LEFT JOIN Track t ON t.AlbumId = al.AlbumId
    WHERE 1=1
    """
    params = []

    if track_name:
        query += " AND t.Name LIKE ?"
        params.append(f"%{track_name}%")
    if album_title:
        query += " AND al.Title LIKE ?"
        params.append(f"%{album_title}%")
    if artist_name:
        query += " AND ar.Name LIKE ?"
        params.append(f"%{artist_name}%")

    cursor.execute(query, params)
    results = cursor.fetchall()

    artists = [row[0] for row in results]

    conn.close()
    return artists


# Agent model
qa_llm = init_chat_model("claude-sonnet-4-6")
# The prebuilt ReACT agent only expects State to have a 'messages' key, so the
# state we defined for the refund agent can also be passed to our lookup agent.
qa_graph = create_agent(qa_llm, [lookup_track, lookup_artist, lookup_album])


# Schema for routing user intent.
# We'll use structured output to enforce that the model returns only
# the desired output.
class UserIntent(TypedDict):
    """The user's current intent in the conversation"""

    intent: Literal["refund", "question_answering"]


# Routing model with structured output
router_llm = init_chat_model("gpt-5.4-mini").with_structured_output(
    UserIntent, method="json_schema", strict=True
)

# Instructions for routing.
route_instructions = """You are managing an online music store that sells song tracks. \
You can help customers in two types of ways: (1) answering general questions about \
tracks sold at your store, (2) helping them get a refund on a purhcase they made at your store.

Based on the following conversation, determine if the user is currently seeking general \
information about song tracks or if they are trying to refund a specific purchase.

Return 'refund' if they are trying to get a refund and 'question_answering' if they are \
asking a general music question. Do NOT return anything else. Do NOT try to respond to \
the user.
"""


# Node for routing.
async def intent_classifier(
    state: State,
) -> Command[Literal["refund_agent", "question_answering_agent"]]:
    response = router_llm.invoke(
        [{"role": "system", "content": route_instructions}, *state["messages"]]
    )
    return Command(goto=response["intent"] + "_agent")


# Node for making sure the 'followup' key is set before our agent run completes.
def compile_followup(state: State) -> dict:
    """Set the followup to be the last message if it hasn't explicitly been set."""
    if not state.get("followup"):
        return {"followup": state["messages"][-1].content}
    return {}


# Agent definition
graph_builder = StateGraph(State)
graph_builder.add_node(intent_classifier)
# Since all of our subagents have compatible state,
# we can add them as nodes directly.
graph_builder.add_node("refund_agent", refund_graph)
graph_builder.add_node("question_answering_agent", qa_graph)
graph_builder.add_node(compile_followup)

graph_builder.set_entry_point("intent_classifier")
graph_builder.add_edge("refund_agent", "compile_followup")
graph_builder.add_edge("question_answering_agent", "compile_followup")
graph_builder.add_edge("compile_followup", END)

graph = graph_builder.compile()


client = Client()

# Create a dataset
examples = [
    {
        "inputs": {
            "question": "How many songs do you have by James Brown"
        },
        "outputs": {
            "response": "We have 20 songs by James Brown",
            "trajectory": ["question_answering_agent", "lookup_tracks"]
        },
    },
    {
        "inputs": {
            "question": "My name is Aaron Mitchell and I'd like a refund.",
        },
        "outputs": {
            "response": "I need some more information to help you with the refund. Please specify your phone number, the invoice ID, or the line item IDs for the purchase you'd like refunded.",
            "trajectory": ["refund_agent"],
        }
    },
    {
        "inputs": {
            "question": "My name is Aaron Mitchell and I'd like a refund on my Led Zeppelin purchases. My number is +1 (204) 452-6452",
        },
        "outputs": {
            "response": "Which of the following purchases would you like to be refunded for?\n\n  invoice_line_id  track_name                        artist_name    purchase_date          quantity_purchased    price_per_unit\n-----------------  --------------------------------  -------------  -------------------  --------------------  ----------------\n              267  How Many More Times               Led Zeppelin   2009-08-06 00:00:00                     1              0.99\n              268  What Is And What Should Never Be  Led Zeppelin   2009-08-06 00:00:00                     1              0.99",
            "trajectory": ["refund_agent", "lookup"],
        },
    },
    {
        "inputs": {
            "question": "Who recorded Wish You Were Here again? What other albums of there's do you have?",
        },
        "outputs": {
            "response": "Wish You Were Here is an album by Pink Floyd",
            "trajectory": ["question_answering_agent", "lookup_album"],
        }
    },
    {
        "inputs": {
            "question": "I want a full refund for invoice 237",
        },
        "outputs": {
            "response": "You have been refunded $2.97.",
            "trajectory": ["refund_agent", "refund"],
        },
    },
]

dataset_name = "Chinook Customer Service Bot: E2E"

if not client.has_dataset(dataset_name=dataset_name):
    dataset = client.create_dataset(dataset_name=dataset_name)
    client.create_examples(
        dataset_id=dataset.id,
        examples=examples
    )

# LLM-as-judge instructions
grader_instructions = """You are a teacher grading a quiz.

You will be given a QUESTION, the GROUND TRUTH (correct) RESPONSE, and the STUDENT RESPONSE.

Here is the grade criteria to follow:
(1) Grade the student responses based ONLY on their factual accuracy relative to the ground truth answer.
(2) Ensure that the student response does not contain any conflicting statements.
(3) It is OK if the student response contains more information than the ground truth response, as long as it is factually accurate relative to the  ground truth response.

Correctness:
True means that the student's response meets all of the criteria.
False means that the student's response does not meet all of the criteria.

Explain your reasoning in a step-by-step manner to ensure your reasoning and conclusion are correct."""


# LLM-as-judge output schema
class Grade(TypedDict):
    """Compare the expected and actual answers and grade the actual answer."""

    reasoning: Annotated[
        str,
        ...,
        "Explain your reasoning for whether the actual response is correct or not.",
    ]
    is_correct: Annotated[
        bool,
        ...,
        "True if the student response is mostly or exactly correct, otherwise False.",
    ]


# Judge LLM
grader_llm = init_chat_model("gpt-5.4-mini", temperature=0).with_structured_output(
    Grade, method="json_schema", strict=True
)


# Evaluator function
async def final_answer_correct(
    inputs: dict, outputs: dict, reference_outputs: dict
) -> bool:
    """Evaluate if the final response is equivalent to reference response."""

    # Note that we assume the outputs has a 'response' dictionary. We'll need to make sure
    # that the target function we define includes this key.
    user = f"""QUESTION: {inputs['question']}
    GROUND TRUTH RESPONSE: {reference_outputs['response']}
    STUDENT RESPONSE: {outputs['response']}"""

    grade = await grader_llm.ainvoke(
        [
            {"role": "system", "content": grader_instructions},
            {"role": "user", "content": user},
        ]
    )
    return grade["is_correct"]


# Target function
async def run_graph(inputs: dict) -> dict:
    """Run graph and track the trajectory it takes along with the final response."""
    result = await graph.ainvoke(
        {
            "messages": [
                {"role": "user", "content": inputs["question"]},
            ]
        },
        config={"env": "test"},
    )
    return {"response": result["followup"]}


# Evaluation job and results
experiment_results = await client.aevaluate(
    run_graph,
    data=dataset_name,
    evaluators=[final_answer_correct],
    experiment_prefix="sql-agent-gpt4o-e2e",
    num_repetitions=1,
    max_concurrency=4,
)
experiment_results.to_pandas()


def trajectory_subsequence(outputs: dict, reference_outputs: dict) -> float:
    """Check how many of the desired steps the agent took."""
    if len(reference_outputs["trajectory"]) > len(outputs["trajectory"]):
        return False

    i = j = 0
    while i < len(reference_outputs["trajectory"]) and j < len(outputs["trajectory"]):
        if reference_outputs["trajectory"][i] == outputs["trajectory"][j]:
            i += 1
        j += 1

    return i / len(reference_outputs["trajectory"])


async def run_graph(inputs: dict) -> dict:
    """Run graph and track the trajectory it takes along with the final response."""
    trajectory = []
    # Set subgraph=True to stream events from subgraphs of the main graph: https://langchain-ai.github.io/langgraph/how-tos/streaming-subgraphs/
    # Set stream_mode="debug" to stream all possible events: https://langchain-ai.github.io/langgra/langsmith/observability-concepts/streaming
    async for namespace, chunk in graph.astream(
        {
            "messages": [
                {
                    "role": "user",
                    "content": inputs["question"],
                }
            ]
        },
        subgraphs=True,
        stream_mode="debug",
    ):
        # Event type for entering a node
        if chunk["type"] == "task":
            # Record the node name
            trajectory.append(chunk["payload"]["name"])
            # Given how we defined our dataset, we also need to track when specific tools are
            # called by our question answering ReACT agent. These tool calls can be found
            # when the ToolsNode (named "tools") is invoked by looking at the AIMessage.tool_calls
            # of the latest input message.
            if chunk["payload"]["name"] == "tools" and chunk["type"] == "task":
                for tc in chunk["payload"]["input"]["messages"][-1].tool_calls:
                    trajectory.append(tc["name"])

    return {"trajectory": trajectory}


experiment_results = await client.aevaluate(
    run_graph,
    data=dataset_name,
    evaluators=[trajectory_subsequence],
    experiment_prefix="sql-agent-gpt4o-trajectory",
    num_repetitions=1,
    max_concurrency=4,
)
experiment_results.to_pandas()

# Create dataset
examples = [
    {
        "inputs": {
            "messages": [
                {
                    "role": "user",
                    "content": "i bought some tracks recently and i dont like them",
                }
            ],
        }
        "outputs": {"route": "refund_agent"},
    },
    {
        "inputs": {
            "messages": [
                {
                    "role": "user",
                    "content": "I was thinking of purchasing some Rolling Stones tunes, any recommendations?",
                }
            ],
        },
        "outputs": {"route": "question_answering_agent"},
    },
    {
        "inputs": {
            "messages": [
                    {"role": "user", "content": "i want a refund on purchase 237"},
                {
                    "role": "assistant",
                    "content": "I've refunded you a total of $1.98. How else can I help you today?",
                },
                {"role": "user", "content": "did prince release any albums in 2000?"},
            ],
        },
        "outputs": {"route": "question_answering_agent"},
    },
    {
        "inputs": {
            "messages": [
                {
                    "role": "user",
                    "content": "i purchased a cover of Yesterday recently but can't remember who it was by, which versions of it do you have?",
                }
            ],
        },
        "outputs": {"route": "question_answering_agent"},
    },
]

dataset_name = "Chinook Customer Service Bot: Intent Classifier"
if not client.has_dataset(dataset_name=dataset_name):
    dataset = client.create_dataset(dataset_name=dataset_name)
    client.create_examples(
        dataset_id=dataset.id,
        examples=examples,
    )


# Evaluator
def correct(outputs: dict, reference_outputs: dict) -> bool:
    """Check if the agent chose the correct route."""
    return outputs["route"] == reference_outputs["route"]


# Target function for running the relevant step
async def run_intent_classifier(inputs: dict) -> dict:
    # Note that we can access and run the intent_classifier node of our graph directly.
    command = await graph.nodes["intent_classifier"].ainvoke(inputs)
    return {"route": command.goto}


# Run evaluation
experiment_results = await client.aevaluate(
    run_intent_classifier,
    data=dataset_name,
    evaluators=[correct],
    experiment_prefix="sql-agent-gpt4o-intent-classifier",
    max_concurrency=4,
)
experiment_results.to_pandas()